Timeline for Problem Set 4 resize vertically resizing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2017 at 15:12 | comment | added | i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i'i | This is a great answer. The headers are completely the same but the diff command says they differ - what shall I go by? | |
| Oct 1, 2016 at 22:17 | vote | accept | AdiKhajuria | ||
| Oct 1, 2016 at 22:14 | comment | added | AdiKhajuria | Update: I have done it. The image now upscales as and shows properly. I ran it through check50 and all the tests went green. Here's how I did it: I changed my formula for biOut.biSizeImage and bfOut.bfSize. Additionally, I calculated the padding for the infile and the outfile independently. Same with the bfSize and the biSizeImage. I also changed the comparison that I am doing in the for loops (i.e. the second argument of the for loop). I won't go through the specifics (so I am not breaching the academic honesty rules) but thanks for everyone's help. | |
| Sep 28, 2016 at 22:07 | history | answered | Cliff B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |