CS50 Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for students of Harvard University's CS50. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
By choosing to use int32_t rather than uint32_t, you choose to cut your maximum positive value in half (correct?).
I am confused because in pset4, int32_t (type alias LONG) is used for storing the value of biHeight, biWidth, biXPelsPerMeter and biYPelsPerMeter.
Can someone explain to me why these values are not always positive? How can a height or width be negative?
In at least one of those cases (I'll let you discover which, it's very important in this pset), the sign of the variable (neg or pos) has a direct bearing on how the image is displayed by the computer. The sign of a variable in a structure is often used as a control feature this way. Consult the msft spec to explain these parameters.
And yes, using a signed int instead of an unsigned cuts the positive range in half, using the difference for the negative. For details, google "twos complement" notation.
It's also often the case that when one var in a structure is used in this way, the others will be made to be the same, simply to be consistent.
If this answers your question, please click on the check mark to accept. Let's keep up on forum maintenance. ;-)
