# style50 weird result

I have a really really long lines for blur function. when I pass it to style50 it asks me to change code style to this:

``````for (int j = 1; j < width - 1 ; j++)
{
image[i][j].rgbtRed = round((copy[i - 1][j - 1].rgbtRed + copy[i - 1][j].rgbtRed + copy[i - 1][j + 1].rgbtRed + copy[i][j -
1].rgbtRed + copy[i][j].rgbtRed + copy[i][j + 1].rgbtRed + copy[i + 1][j - 1].rgbtRed + copy[i + 1][j].rgbtRed + copy[i + 1][j +

1].rgbtRed) / 9.0);
image[i][j].rgbtGreen = round((copy[i - 1][j - 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i - 1][j].rgbtGreen + copy[i - 1][j + 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i][j -
1].rgbtGreen + copy[i][j].rgbtGreen + copy[i][j + 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i + 1][j - 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i + 1][j].rgbtGreen + cop
y[i +
1][j + 1].rgbtGreen) / 9.0);
image[i][j].rgbtBlue = round((copy[i - 1][j - 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i - 1][j].rgbtBlue + copy[i - 1][j + 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i][j -
1].rgbtBlue + copy[i][j].rgbtBlue + copy[i][j + 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i + 1][j - 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i + 1][j].rgbtBlue + copy[i +
1][j
+ 1].rgbtBlue) / 9.0);
}
``````

is that a bug or really the code is more readable in this way?
I think following code is more readable than that:

``````image[i][j].rgbtRed = round((copy[i - 1][j - 1].rgbtRed + copy[i - 1][j].rgbtRed + copy[i - 1][j + 1].rgbtRed + copy[i][j -1].rgbtRed + copy[i][j].rgbtRed + copy[i][j + 1].rgbtRed + copy[i + 1][j - 1].rgbtRed + copy[i + 1][j].rgbtRed + copy[i + 1][j +1].rgbtRed) / 9.0);
image[i][j].rgbtGreen = round((copy[i - 1][j - 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i - 1][j].rgbtGreen + copy[i - 1][j + 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i][j - 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i][j].rgbtGreen + copy[i][j + 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i + 1][j - 1].rgbtGreen + copy[i + 1][j].rgbtGreen + copy[i + 1][j + 1].rgbtGreen) / 9.0);
image[i][j].rgbtBlue = round((copy[i - 1][j - 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i - 1][j].rgbtBlue + copy[i - 1][j + 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i][j - 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i][j].rgbtBlue + copy[i][j + 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i + 1][j - 1].rgbtBlue + copy[i + 1][j].rgbtBlue + copy[i + 1][j + 1].rgbtBlue) / 9.0);
``````

although it is very long but we know what happened in the code.